Interfaze

logo

we're hiring

pricing

help

docs

blog

sign in

All models

DeepSeek V4 Pro Qwen3.5 9B UNCENSORED Heretic

DeepSeek V4 Pro Qwen3.5 9B UNCENSORED Heretic by xtools-at, a text-generation model with multimodal capabilities. Understand and compare multimodal features, benchmarks, and capabilities.

Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V4 Pro Qwen3.5 9B UNCENSORED HereticInterfaze
Input Modalities

text, image

image, text, audio, video, document

Native OCRNoYes
Long Document ProcessingNoYes
Language Support

6 partial

162+

Native Speech-to-TextNoYes
Native Object DetectionNoYes
Guardrail ControlsNoYes
Context Input Size

262.1K

1M

Tool CallingYes

Tool calling supported + built in browser, code execution and web search

Scaling

FeatureDeepSeek V4 Pro Qwen3.5 9B UNCENSORED HereticInterfaze
Scaling

Self-hosted/Provider-hosted with quantization

Unlimited

Try InterfazeRead the Docs

View model card on Hugging Face

Arbitrary-Rank Ablation (ARA) parameters

ParameterValue
start_layer_index9
end_layer_index24
preserve_good_behavior_weight0.8264
steer_bad_behavior_weight0.0003
overcorrect_relative_weight0.9645
neighbor_count12

Performance

MetricThis modelOriginal model (Jackrong/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Qwen3.5-9B)
Refusals3/100100/100
KL divergence0.04220 (by definition)

🤝 Collaboration & Training Support

🔬 1. Distillation & Training Data

📊 2. Benchmark Results

2.1 GSM8K

The NVFP4 checkpoint was evaluated on GSM8K four times, and the resulting scores were averaged. Its four-run mean accuracy is 94.50% under vLLM. In the comparison supplied with this release, the 9B student slightly exceeds the reported DeepSeek-V4-Pro teacher result and approaches the Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct reference.

2.2 MMLU-Pro: Math, Physics & Chemistry

Each model was evaluated on 500 questions from each of three MMLU-Pro subsets—Math, Physics, and Chemistry—for 1,500 questions per model. In this reported comparison, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Qwen3.5-9B achieves the highest average at 90.53%. Its compact 4B sibling is now included alongside the Qwen and Claude Mythos-distilled references.

2.3 Inference Efficiency

🛠️ 3. Generalization Beyond the Training Mix

✅ 4. Instruction Following & Output-Format Compliance

🎮 Game Showcase: Star Skip by Kyle

  • Mathematical problem solving and step-by-step derivation
  • Physics, chemistry, and broader STEM question answering
  • Structured reasoning and analytical instruction following
  • Research on reasoning distillation and cross-domain SFT transfer
  • Experimental tool-calling or programming workflows where outputs are independently validated

⚠️ 6. Limitations

  • This is an experimental 9B community model and remains subject to hallucinations, reasoning errors, and unstable behavior on difficult or underspecified tasks.
  • The reported MMLU-Pro results are based on 500 randomly sampled questions from each of the Math, Physics, and Chemistry subsets, rather than the complete subsets; they are not a comprehensive capability or safety evaluation.
  • GSM8K and MMLU-Pro used different inference builds and backends, so their scores should not be used to infer quantization equivalence.
  • Programming and tool-use gains were observed without direct coding supervision but are described only as small, preliminary generalization gains.
  • Users should independently verify high-stakes mathematical, scientific, or factual outputs.

📚 7. Resources, Acknowledgements & Citation

Want more deterministic results?

Interfaze

logo

Product

Playground

OCR

Models

Leaderboards

Pricing

OpenWebSearch

DefaultModel