Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled

🔥 Update (April 5): I’ve released the complete training notebook, codebase, and a comprehensive PDF guide to help beginners and enthusiasts understand and reproduce this model's fine-tuning process.

📚 Resources & Guides

👉 GitHub Repository: Jackrong-llm-finetuning-guide Visit the repo to dive into the codebase and reproduce the results locally or on Colab.

📥 Core Technical Document

🔗 Qwopus3.5-27b Complete Fine-Tuning Guide (PDF)

• The Full Pipeline: A step-by-step walkthrough—from downloading the base model and unifying heterogeneous data, to configuring trainer hyperparameters and publishing to Hugging Face.
• Beginner Friendly: Includes an introductory guide to getting started with Google Colab and Unsloth.
• Feedback welcome! If you spot any areas for improvement, please let me know and I will update it promptly.

💡 Model Introduction

Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled is a highly capable reasoning model fine-tuned on top of the powerful Qwen3.5 architecture. The model's core directive is to leverage state-of-the-art Chain-of-Thought (CoT) distillation primarily sourced from Claude-4.6 Opus interactions.

Through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) focusing specifically on structured reasoning logic, this model excels in breaking down complex user problems, planning step-by-step methodologies within strictly formatted <think> tags, and ultimately delivering precise, nuanced solutions.

🧠 Example of Learned Reasoning Scaffold（Example）

The model includes targeted optimizations addressing Qwen3.5’s tendency toward excessive transitional or repetitive reasoning on simple queries. Through deep distillation and structural imitation of Claude-4.6-Opus reasoning chains, the model adopts a more efficient structured thinking pattern:
“Let me analyze this request carefully: 1..2..3...”.
This streamlined reasoning paradigm significantly reduces redundant cognitive loops while preserving deep analytical capacity, resulting in substantially improved inference efficiency.

Let me analyze this request carefully:

1. Identify the core objective of the problem.
2. Break the task into clearly defined subcomponents.
3. Evaluate constraints and edge cases.
4. Formulate a step-by-step solution plan.
5. Execute the reasoning sequentially and verify consistency.
            .
            .
            .

🗺️ Training Pipeline Overview

Base Model (Qwen3.5-27B)
 │
 ▼
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) + LoRA
 │
 ▼
Final Model (Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled,text-only)

📋 Stage Details

🔧Tool Calling Benchmark（benchmark tests by user @Chris Klaus）

🔥Community-tested advantages (benchmark tests by user @sudoing on a single RTX 3090):

Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled shows significant advantages in coding-agent environments such as Claude Code and OpenCode:

• These improvements come from successfully distilling the structured reasoning style of Claude 4.6 Opus, allowing Qwopus to be truly plug-and-play in modern local coding agents and deliver an experience close to Opus in smoothness and usability.

🔹 Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)

• Objective: To inject high-density reasoning logic and establish a strict format for problem-solving involving an internal thinking state prior to outputting the final response.
• Methodology: We utilized Unsloth for highly efficient memory and compute optimization. A critical component of this stage is the train_on_responses_only strategy, masking instructions so the loss is purely calculated over the generation of the <think> sequences and the subsequent solutions.
• Format Enforcement: All training samples were systematically normalized so the model strictly abides by the structure <think> {internal reasoning} </think>\n {final answer}.

📚 All Datasets Used

The dataset consists of high-quality, filtered reasoning distillation data:

🌟 Core Skills & Capabilities

1. Modular & Structured Thinking: Inheriting traits from Opus-level reasoning, the model demonstrates confident parsing of the prompt, establishing an outlined plan in its <think> block sequentially rather than exploratory "trial-and-error" self-doubt.

⚠️ Limitations & Intended Use

• Hallucination Risk: While reasoning is strong, the model remains an autoregressive LLM; external facts provided during the thinking sequence may occasionally contain hallucinations if verifying real-world events.
• Intended Scenario: Best suited for offline analytical tasks, coding, math, and heavy logic-dependent prompting where the user needs to transparently follow the AI's internal logic.
• Preview Version Notice: Because this model is relatively new and intentionally lightweight, the surrounding ecosystem — including inference templates, fine-tuning pipelines, routing configurations, and tooling integrations — may not yet be fully mature or standardized. As a result, users may encounter occasional bugs, compatibility inconsistencies, or integration edge cases. The current release should be considered a preview build while the broader architectural stack and supporting utilities continue to stabilize and improve.

🙏 Acknowledgements

Significant thanks to the Unsloth AI team for making rapid fine-tuning of MoE and large LLM models accessible. Additionally, we acknowledge Qwen internally, and the open-source community developers producing exceptional distilled datasets (nohurry and TeichAI).

📖 Citation

If you use this model in your research or projects, please cite:

@misc{jackrong_qwen35_opus_distilled,
  title        = {Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled},
  author       = {Jackrong},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Hugging Face},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled}}
}